Paul Krugman feels happy. The US House of Representatives is likely to enact the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), and President Joe Biden will sign it into law. According to Krugman, the package, which constitutes the largest climate investment in the history of the country, consists mostly of a climate change measure with a side of health reform.
The New York Times media columnist believes that this is a very important matter despite the fact that he acknowledges that the legislation won’t be sufficient to stop a global catastrophe on its own.
PAULIN KRUGMAN, WHO IS HE? International trade theorist Paul Krugman has a keen interest in economic geography. His contributions to the field of international economics include the creation of New Trade Theory and New Economic Geography , as well as models for financial crises and changes in exchange rates.
According to Krugman, an economist with an Neo-Keynesian rating, sticky prices and wages lead to involuntary unemployment and have a considerable impact on monetary policy. For his examination of trade patterns and the geographic distribution of economic activity, Krugman was named the only winner of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 2008. Each year, recipients of this Nobel Prize for economics research make outstanding contributions to the discipline that have stood the test of time.
INFLATION REDUCTION ACT’S DEVELOPMENT The Build Back Better Act was the previous name for the IRA (BBB). Biden’s climate strategy was in doubt for almost 18 months as the White House and Democrats engaged in contentious discussions over the BBB with Senator Joe Manchin III (D-Coal).
Initially, Krugman was concerned about the repercussions if the original BBB failed, stating that there would be significant human and, yes, economic costs if Biden’s moderate but essential spending proposals failed. Instead of grasping hold of the very profitable environmental investments that would, most likely, pay for themselves over time, the convergence of a better future for the US was perched on a political precipice.
Krugman wrote in late 2021 said that decreasing our reliance on fossil fuels would have benefits beyond lowering greenhouse gas emissions. It would also lessen other types of pollutants, particularly sulfur and nitrogen oxides, which are harmful to health and agriculture output.
Like Joseph Stiglist, Krugman thinks that the IRA’s approval will be a significant step in the right direction, in part because it creates opportunities for the future.
It will accelerate the development of green technology. Additional legislation will be easier to pass because of its economic advantages. It offers the US the legitimacy it needs to take the helm of an international initiative to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Krugman claims that real experts in energy and the environment are ecstatic about what has been accomplished, disregarding cynics seeking to discredit the accomplishment.
Inflation is not a concern for serious economists like Krugman. How come?
Regarding the environment, Krugman recognizes that a lot of people believe that the IRA legislation significantly watered down President Biden’s BBB environmental agenda. The new version must be a mere shadow of the BBB goal because to Manchin concessions and giveaways to fossil fuel interests (such as funding for a contentious natural gas project). Or so many people believe.
In reality, according to Krugman, energy analysts think that gains from tax credits for clean energy will more than exceed any negative climate effects from these concessions. The REPEAT Project provides independent environmental and economic review of federal energy and climate policies as they are proposed and implemented. It also gives a side-by-side comparison of emissions reductions under the IRA and the earlier House version of BBB. According to their calculations, the IRA will generate more than 90% of the carbon reductions that BBB would have produced by 2035. After all that parliamentary turmoil, Krugman comes to the conclusion that Biden’s climate policy has largely survived unaltered.
The IRA’s integrity is not a happy accident. The Biden administration made the decision to frame its climate policy as rewards for doing the right thing rather than as sanctions for doing the wrong thing. According to Krugman, this tactic has been proven successful since it is more politically possible than alternatives like enacting a carbon price.
Political benefits in the future: In citing an study of green energy jobs for August 2022, Krugman describes the research of the author: The expansion of renewable energy results in the development of relatively well-paying employment, most of which are located in regions that would suffer from a drop in the number of jobs related to the exploitation of fossil fuels. Today’s shift to a low-carbon, resource-efficient economy necessitates systemic changes that will not only lead to new goods and services but also to modifications in company models, labor requirements, and job assignments. The development of green skills, which are the knowledge, skills, values, and attitudes required to live in, build, and support a sustainable and resource-efficient society, will be facilitated through green occupations.
According to the AFL-CIO , the IRA is a victory for working people. According to the BlueGreen Alliance , the IRA’s more than 100 investments in the environment, energy, and climate will generate more than 9 million good employment over the course of the following ten years, or roughly 1 million jobs annually. According to The Center for American Progress , the IRA will boost American production of batteries, solar panels, wind turbines, and more, putting the US in a competitive position in the global clean energy economy and generating millions of jobs in the sector. THE IRA, PAUL KRUGMAN, ANDAMP; PROGRESS IN THE DIRECTION OF ZERO EMISSIONS: FINAL THOUGHTS Did Democrats Just Save Civilization? is the title of the original Krugman New York Times editorial. According to Krugman, Democrats have more-or-less fully complied with their climate pledges thanks to the vast potential for decent job creation, solutions for the renewable energy crisis, and tools to slow down global warming.
A summary provided by New Trade Theory 0 lists some of the financing directed toward customers as follows:
$9 billion in home energy rebate programs, with an emphasis on low-income households, to assist people in electrifying their home appliances and for energy-efficient retrofits. 10 years of consumer tax credits will lower the cost of electric HVAC, heat pumps, rooftop solar, and water heaters, increasing the energy efficiency of households. For people with lower and moderate incomes who purchase used electric vehicles, tax incentives range from $4,000 to $7,500. A $1 billion grant initiative to improve the energy efficiency of affordable dwellings Yes, the IRA extended an olive branch by making concessions to the development of oil and gas in order to earn Manchin’s favor. Despite their resentment, the legislation—which no Senate Republican supported—passed, according to Krugman.
And compared to a few weeks ago, the world is a more optimistic place.
Do you value the unique reporting and cleantech news coverage on CleanTechnica? Think about signing up as a patron on New Trade Theory 1 or as a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador. Don’t miss a cleantech story, will ya? Register for New Trade Theory 2 by email. Or New Trade Theory 3 Want to advertise with CleanTechnica, send us a tip, or propose a speaker for our podcast CleanTech Talk? You can reach us here.
